Winning at the races is not LUCK.  Loosing is not BAD LUCK.   It's not what you don't kow but what you think you know that causes you to take the dark path of betting horses that can't win.

I would much rather know why a horse can't win then believe he can win based on the past performances. Did you know that there are 135 variables in any given horse race. Do you know them all?  Do you even know 10? Most would say just learn a few and your going to do just fine. Not true. Have you realized what it takes to win a horse race  as a bettor?

What are the quilifications to be called a professional handicapper? 30% wins. Some would say the standard is only 30%. If you were a quarterback in the NFL and you only completed 3 out of every 10 passes how long would you be in the game? NFL (NOT FOR LONG).

I've been a student of the sport of Kings since 1974. When I was a Mathematics and Science major at a one of the top 100 universities in the USA.

A real professional handicapper knows one thing for sure. Handicapping is both a ART and a SCIENCE. 

Our site dosen't sale systems that don't work over the long haul. We don't sale books with useless information touting the few times we had a big winning ticket. We don't give you a list and say look at these horses that all have a chance to win. If it's one thing I know about a horse race is that if their in the race they can surely win.

You do the math you can't come out ahead betting every race at every track. The human brain doesn't function on such a high level. Even with A PhD . After all, many of PhD's have lost their shirts at the local track.

Why not take the horse with a very good advantage over the rest of the field. This gives you 1 or 2, maybe 3 bets a day. It's not how many races you bet but how many you win.

Don't take chances on a lark when you can bet a solid horse who has a very good chance of winning the race.